  Cokebeard
(Crazed Contributor)
Level 41 (82%)
Posts: 8116
Contrib Points: 11424.8
Mood: bored
Since: 06/Dec/05
  
Cokebeard is cooler than Jebus |
|
Quick Reply | Quote
|
i've been really into this from the beginning. i like the story. especially, the checkered past of sara. it adds a nice twist that this is more than just kidnapping. then the freemason symbols gives you that maybe a secret society is trying to minipulate thing, but maybe they're just using them to seem that way. it's just the tip of the ice berg.
moving on to this episode in peticular. i understand they are adding eddie cibrian to the cast, but did they really have to kill off the Agent Kelton character? i've grown to like him and while i am a cibrian fan, this was really starting to be gale harold's show. killing off main characters in now becoming a common cliche. it was crazy when it started, but now i just wait for a cast member to bite it in practically everything i watch. pretty brave thing to do right before a long hiatus during the baseball playoffs. |
|
| Message Posted On Tuesday, October 3rd 2006 At 9:01 am |
 TV-Bone
Level 1 (31%)
Posts: 14
Contrib Points: 0
Since: 26/Sep/06
|
|
Quick Reply | Quote
|
Just to get one thing straight before i start.. is the series going to take a LONG break now?? 
I think this twist, killing Kelton, was somewhat a downside -to a rather fantastic series! I actually thought much/some of the plot was involving Graham Kelton.. by killing him off that appears to be, either a) just a nonsense theory, or b) just a waste of time, if there were any truth to that (refering to all the flashbacks to his past; Nathan, etc).
I think it's a very strange step/choise/move to kill of the MAIN character.. Cause, as far as I'm concerned; he's the only main* character there is.. It's through HIM the series' been told, more or less.. (I know this is arguable).
Eddie Cibrian aka. Daniel Lucas; is that the same person that's Judy Nash's ex-boyfriend, AND who met Graham Kelton in the office? I didn't quite understand his part yet..
And, a little side-note from myself; I started another thread a few days ago, which I hoped to discuss the "mysterious" Sara Collins, though; without any luck.. But I did find the scene where Sara was held in a cage a bit strange.. because I was SO certain that Sara Collins had one or two fingers behind the scene, behind the whole "Vanishing" -incident..
This has been a brilliant series, but I did get a bad stomach -feeling after this episode.. Hope they'll prove me wrong in the next episode! Dead wrong! |
|
| Message Posted On Tuesday, October 3rd 2006 At 11:02 pm |
Cokebeard
(Crazed Contributor)
Level 41 (82%)
Posts: 8116
Contrib Points: 11424.8
Mood: bored
Since: 06/Dec/05
Cokebeard is cooler than Jebus |
|
Quick Reply | Quote
|
| On Tuesday, October 3rd 2006 11:02 pm, TV-Bone wrote: | | Just to get one thing straight before i start.. is the series going to take a LONG break now?? |
it is taking a break for the baseball playoffs. fox is an idiot for keeping them. they get murdered every year. their new series sometimes take the hit for it because people go away and a lot don't come back after the world series.
| On Tuesday, October 3rd 2006 11:02 pm, TV-Bone wrote: | | I think this twist, killing Kelton, was somewhat a downside -to a rather fantastic series! I actually thought much/some of the plot was involving Graham Kelton.. by killing him off that appears to be, either a) just a nonsense theory, or b) just a waste of time, if there were any truth to that (refering to all the flashbacks to his past; Nathan, etc). |
i agree. it almost tastes like gale harold pissed them off or they wanted eddie cibrian from the beginning but he couldn't start right away. i think there is more to this than just a plot twist. if they were gonna kill him from the beginning, i wish the wouldn't have gotten so involved with him.
| On Tuesday, October 3rd 2006 11:02 pm, TV-Bone wrote: | | I think it's a very strange step/choise/move to kill of the MAIN character.. Cause, as far as I'm concerned; he's the only main* character there is.. It's through HIM the series' been told, more or less.. (I know this is arguable). |
i'll agree with you on it's being told mostly thru him. if they were looking for a shocking moment, they screwed up. it only made me angry not intrigued.
| On Tuesday, October 3rd 2006 11:02 pm, TV-Bone wrote: | | Eddie Cibrian aka. Daniel Lucas; is that the same person that's Judy Nash's ex-boyfriend, AND who met Graham Kelton in the office? I didn't quite understand his part yet.. |
yes, he is both people. he is now going to take the lead in the hunt for sara. i suppose you know that though.
| On Tuesday, October 3rd 2006 11:02 pm, TV-Bone wrote: | | And, a little side-note from myself; I started another thread a few days ago, which I hoped to discuss the "mysterious" Sara Collins, though; without any luck.. But I did find the scene where Sara was held in a cage a bit strange.. because I was SO certain that Sara Collins had one or two fingers behind the scene, behind the whole "Vanishing" -incident.. |
sorry i haven't got involved more. i saw that thread, but i've got myself spread pretty thin this season with all the new shows. sometimes it's hard to find someone to talk to, but i'll be around more and more as i weed out which shows i'll continue to watch. this one has made the cut thus far.
| On Tuesday, October 3rd 2006 11:02 pm, TV-Bone wrote: | | This has been a brilliant series, but I did get a bad stomach -feeling after this episode.. Hope they'll prove me wrong in the next episode! Dead wrong! |
again, those are my feelings as well. i hope they know what they're doing. as far as i'm concerned gale harold was doing an exceptional job. |
|
| Message Posted On Wednesday, October 4th 2006 At 3:20 pm |
|
Digg
Furl
Del.icio.us
Google