On Saturday, August 26th 2006 7:06 am, AstroDude100 wrote:

Why are we thinking about 2008?

Next US presidential election

On Saturday, August 26th 2006 7:22 am, shes_wicked wrote:

On Saturday, August 26th 2006 7:06 am, AstroDude100 wrote: Why are we thinking about 2008? Next US presidential election

and it might be the first time we have a female president.

On Saturday, August 26th 2006 3:50 pm, andrew wrote:

On Saturday, August 26th 2006 7:22 am, shes_wicked wrote: On Saturday, August 26th 2006 7:06 am, AstroDude100 wrote: Why are we thinking about 2008? Next US presidential election and it might be the first time we have a female president.

I honestly doubt it . . .

On Saturday, August 26th 2006 7:11 pm, shes_wicked wrote:

On Saturday, August 26th 2006 3:50 pm, andrew wrote: On Saturday, August 26th 2006 7:22 am, shes_wicked wrote: On Saturday, August 26th 2006 7:06 am, AstroDude100 wrote: Why are we thinking about 2008? Next US presidential election and it might be the first time we have a female president. I honestly doubt it . . .

I;m not trying to be sexist or anything, but I don't think it's right to have a female president. It just seems odd. I'm traditional. I'll be open for change though. I don't really care though, as long as they're a good leader.

On Saturday, August 26th 2006 7:13 pm, andrew wrote:

On Saturday, August 26th 2006 7:11 pm, shes_wicked wrote: On Saturday, August 26th 2006 3:50 pm, andrew wrote: On Saturday, August 26th 2006 7:22 am, shes_wicked wrote: On Saturday, August 26th 2006 7:06 am, AstroDude100 wrote: Why are we thinking about 2008? Next US presidential election and it might be the first time we have a female president. I honestly doubt it . . . I;m not trying to be sexist or anything, but I don't think it's right to have a female president. It just seems odd. I'm traditional. I'll be open for change though. I don't really care though, as long as they're a good leader.

I think its right and all that PC crap . . .

But traditions do not change that easily

I think we should have a housewife/stay-at-home-mome run for president. Instead of starting wars all the time, she could just send the terrorists to their rooms without supper. ^o^

On Saturday, August 26th 2006 7:32 pm, crazy_legs_1205 wrote:

I think we should have a housewife/stay-at-home-mome run for president. Instead of starting wars all the time, she could just send the terrorists to their rooms without supper. ^o^

Let's start our own party. The Soccer Mom/Housewife Dual Party.

On Saturday, August 26th 2006 10:17 pm, andrew wrote:

On Saturday, August 26th 2006 7:32 pm, crazy_legs_1205 wrote: I think we should have a housewife/stay-at-home-mome run for president. Instead of starting wars all the time, she could just send the terrorists to their rooms without supper. ^o^ Let's start our own party. The Soccer Mom/Housewife Dual Party.

Sounds good. I think we need a catchier name, though. How about... the Momocrats? ^o^

Republican scum. (Star Wars quote.. changed a bit) no offense republicans of teh site
_____________________________________________
As Batz just said and I quote:

On Saturday, August 26th 2006 10:57 pm, Batman_Beyonder2 wrote:

KNEEL BEFORE ZOD! :@

General Zod 2008
http://www.zod2008.com/

Zod Campaign site Wrote:

When I first came to your planet and demanded your homes, property and very lives, I didn't know you were already doing so, willingly, with your own government. I can win no tribute from a bankrupted nation populated by feeble flag-waving plebians. In 2008 I shall restore your dignity and make you servants worthy of my rule. This new government shall become a tool of my oppression. Instead of hidden agendas and waffling policies, I offer you direct candor and brutal certainty. I only ask for your tribute, your lives, and your vote. -- General Zod Your Future President and Eternal Ruler

Hey, that picture looks familiar:

On Sunday, August 27th 2006 7:10 am, KingJohn23 wrote:

Hey, that picture looks familiar:

Very familiar lol

On Sunday, August 27th 2006 7:10 am, KingJohn23 wrote:

Hey, that picture looks familiar:

I can't quite put my finger on why though?^o^

Lieberman lost his primary, no way he could win.

Al Gore is the Democrats strongest candidate for sure.

On Monday, August 28th 2006 3:20 pm, Kingzjester wrote:

Lieberman lost his primary, no way he could win. Al Gore is the Democrats strongest candidate for sure.

If I was an American citizen, I'd vote for him hands down.

I don't know if Rudy Guiliani could pull it off. I don't think people will elect some guy who has just been a Mayor of a city. Mayor of a city to president? The thing that help him out was 9/11, if it was not for 9/11 nobody would know who he was.

The only guy running for president for sure is Joe Biden, atleast that's what they said on Wikipedia. I think Biden would do worst than Kerry. No guy has won from the north since JFK. They all came from the south and California. Dumb move for both parties if they elect a northern.