Login or register  
TV

The Walking Dead's Cast and Crew Respond To Fan Complaints About Season Two

The Walking Dead season 2 cast

While most fans seem to agree that the second half was quite good, the first seven episodes of The Walking Dead's second season were met with countless complaints about slow pacing, too much talking, and not enough zombie brains being splattered everywhere. With the characters now having left the relative security of Hershel's farm behind, season three promises to be the most action-packed one yet. In the meantime, EW.com asked various members of the show's cast and crew what they thought about season 2's pace, and here are a few of their answers -

Andrew Lincoln (Rick)

"I don’t watch the show, and I don’t read reviews. I stay out of the equation. All I knew is, I always had a sense that they wanted to play it out as a big movie. They always wanted to say that it’s a big story we’re telling and if you stick with it you will be rewarded. That was always Frank’s intention and Glen’s too. I shot it, so I was like, ‘I know what’s coming.’ I remember doing a lot of press for Spain, and Spain was going, ‘More Zombie.’ And I was like, ‘Please believe me, there is more zombie killing coming.’ Of course we want to get the balance right. We’re still learning what works and what doesn’t work. You can please some of the people some of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time. You can’t please all the people all the time. That’s just taste, and that’s cool. What I keep saying to people is that there is a very vocal, very extreme group of people that want a certain thing from this show. And they will watch this show. They will because it is extreme — more extreme than any f—ing thing I’ve ever been on. And the stuff we’re doing this season is out of the ballpark — it’s crazy what we’re doing this season."

Steven Yeun (Glenn)

"You take it personal in a way because this is something that you’ve worked hard at — and as a group, as a collective, you feel like you put your blood, sweat and tears into this. But at the same time, you realize that the arts are subjective. You accept what they give you, and then subsequently laugh when they say, ‘I can’t wait for the next season.’ And you’re very thrilled and happy about that. We know how this plays out by virtue of us filming this. So for me, it was always just like: Wait for it; wait for it. There’s a plan; we’re all here. There’s a solid checks and balances system of not letting something go too far one way. It’s a beautiful group dynamic, and I think it’s a testament to the cast and crew and writers and producers; everybody has their gear that they work. We get it, we’re not perfect, and obviously, last season wasn’t perfect. But you tweak, you stay consistent as well. You hope that people come back and watch."

Norman Reedus (Daryl)

"People are going say whatever they’re going to say anyway. If we killed a zillion zombies last season everyone would say, ‘There’s no storyline, they don’t talk enough.’ So f— ‘em! I’ve been trying to get into Game of Thrones. I can’t tell if it’s the future or the past, but those motherf—ers talk the whole time. Do I gotta bitch about it, or am I going to watch it and enjoy? I’m going to watch it and enjoy. People are going say whatever they say. You have to talk to tell a story. It’s not a cartoon. The pace this season is definitely amped up. We’re just talking faster."

Robert Kirkman (Creator/Executive Producer)

"I know that we’re all very proud of season 2, and we’re very happy with how it turned out.  I think that once you see it all as a whole, you see how the first half — that some people said was slow — kind of built to a cool moment and really facilitated what happened in the later faster paced episodes."

Gale Anne Hurd (Executive Producer)

"It’s got to put it in perspective. The number of people who complain are so minor; it’s a small group that we tend to blow it out of proportion. If they were that unhappy, they would have tuned out. They would not have been around —since we had a split season — come February when we started up again. I think it’s everyone’s right to be able to complain, but for the most part we would not have had the investment in the characters — many of whom ended up not making it to the end of the season — if we hadn’t spent that time the first half of the season building up the character dynamic and getting to know them better."

The full article linked above also features responses from cast members Sarah Wayne Callies (Lori), and Laurie Holden (Andrea).

So, where do you guys and gals stand? Are the cast and crew right about the criticisms being unfairly overblown, or do you agree with season two's detractors?


Details
Show:
- The Walking Dead
Network:
- amc

Written by: Michael Stevenson
Sep 6th, 2012, 4:51 am

dead head

Message Posted On Sep 9th, 2012, 1:46 pm
everyone has an opinion as for me i think the show is well scripted,of course we want to see more zombie killings. but with less of a story line i believe the show will lose its substance. so far so good as far as im concerned.with that being said i can't wait till season3 what will they have installed for us? stay tuned.
mcpherson

Level 3 (36%)
Since: 15/Feb/12
Message Posted On Sep 6th, 2012, 1:49 pm

Also, saying that people complained about the "boring talking stuff" is setting up a straw man. Most complaints about season 2's pacing were legitimate ones. 

mcpherson

Level 3 (36%)
Since: 15/Feb/12
Message Posted On Sep 6th, 2012, 1:48 pm

Josh, you can't argue against the fact that "Cherokee Rose," is just an awful, awful hour of television. It was where the searching for Sophia storyline started to get really tired, and the well zombie incident has really no basis in logic and is essentially just a twenty-minute-long contrivance. 

 

I've read the first 150 issues of the comic book (which I like), and you'll notice that it's quite a lot faster paced. If the series had been faithful to the graphic novels, they would have been off the farm when the barn opened in episode 7, which was an endpoint I think they should have strived for. It's a fact that the first half of season 2 was stretched out to accommodate for the Black Hawk Down meets zombies premiere that Darabont pitched, which I think would have been really cool, and an interesting tie-in to the series that would have provided scope. It would have been courageous, but AMC airs courageous shows all the time. I have no doubt season 2 would have a better rap if they'd just let Darabont do his thing. 

bad_subject

Level 4 (22%)
Points: 263.4
Since: 22/Aug/12
Message Posted On Sep 6th, 2012, 9:37 am

Reedus is the man.

Chrononaut

Level 3 (9%)
Points: 1.5
Since: 02/Aug/12
Message Posted On Sep 6th, 2012, 8:33 am

Anyone complaining that the first half of Season 2 was too slow and had too much of that boring "talking" stuff clearly has no clue about the source material. It's all about setting up those big, crazy moments by giving the characters a false sense of security and then pulling the rug out from under them. The lengthy search for Sophia that so many criticized was paid off big-time when she walked out of the barn. That reveal wouldn't have had the emotional and ironic weight it did without the build-up.

 

Outside of the pilot episode, I'd say Season 1 paled in comparison to Season 2. And correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Darabont's idea for the Season 2 premiere to completely ignore the main characters and follow another group? That's interesting, but kinda dumb for a season premiere when we waited a year to find out what happened to the characters we got to know. I also thought he was still in control for most of the first half of the season. Nothing against Frank, but he tends to get too schmaltzy at times.

mcpherson

Level 3 (36%)
Since: 15/Feb/12
Message Posted On Sep 6th, 2012, 7:53 am

The Walking Dead's second season was a really flawed outing, but a lot of that responsibility lies with AMC, who really sort of pulled the rug out from under Frank Darabont's plan. That's why there was a lot of filler; if the show had aired as originally planned, I don't think anyone would be complaining. 

Having said that, the casts' defense mainly seems to consist of 'we can either talk or kill zombies,' which really isn't an argument at all. The show found a pretty damn good balance with "Nebraska," which is one of my favorite episodes of the series so far. "Judge, Jury, and Executioner" is also a really good example. So yeah, I think a lot of the criticism will be rendered moot by Glen Mazzara's direction. 

As for the person who commented before me, what are you talking about? We're supposed to criticize mass media when it disappoints us. It wasn't nitpicking; there were serious, serious structural problems with season 2. I'm happy the backlash was there and that the creative team is aware of it. That means they'll work to give us a better show. 

matt4848

Level 1 (89%)
Since: 29/Feb/12
Message Posted On Sep 6th, 2012, 7:29 am

I think people need to shut the hell up and stop nitpicking. If you dont like it, go buy yourself a camera, zombie makeup, your own actors, your own studio, your own editing equipment.... go ahead try and make something near TWD.

Related news

What Did You Think of The Walking Dead's Shocking Mid-Season Finale?

Last night’s The Walking Dead mid-season finale “Pretty Much Dead..

"The Walking Dead" Graphic Novels Dominate The New York Times Bestseller List

The Walking Dead has become one of television's freshest and most unique..

AMC Developing "Goodfellas" Weekly Drama

AMC is the cable station that was once an underdog, but is now home to..