Norman Reedus talks about the showrunner upheaval on 'The Walking Dead'

Norman Reedus

The Walking Dead has been on top of its game and smashing ratings records since its first season, and yet, it seems to have some trouble keeping a showrunner staffed. First, AMC booted season 1 showrunner Frank Darabont from the show. Darabont was followed up by Glen Mazarra for season 2, who did a fantastic job of steadily increasing the viewership of an already massively popular show. Then, in the tail end of 2012, it was announced that Mazarra would be leaving the show after season 3 due to “creative differences”? Executive producer Scott Gimple has been named as the new showrunner for season 4. So what is the deal with all the switch-ups? The Walking Dead resident bow-slinger Norman Reedus chimed in on how this has affected the actors on the show.

“I remember with Frank we were like, ‘What?’” says Reedus. “That was the first big hit because Frank brought us there. So that was a big deal, but Glenn was Frank’s No. 2 so we didn’t see a new person. Then Scott is Glenn’s No. 2 so we’re not seeing any new stuff. It’s interesting because it brings the cast together — like this is ours and we’re going to fight for it.”

Reedus says that the cast has really not had to make many adjustments to the changes, because each change has involved a staff member they are familiar with. . “The thing about those showrunner decisions, they are made without me in the room, without all of us in the room,” says Reedus. “But it’s not like it’s a whole new vibe. We’re still doing the same thing. We still have solid writing and the same directors. It’s the same people talking, the same people making the same thing. So it doesn’t really change that much, to be honest.”

Well there you have it. 

- The Walking Dead
- Norman Reedus
- amc

Written by: harrisr
Mar 23rd, 2013, 4:07 am

Images courtesy of AMC


Level 2 (77%)
Since: 02/Mar/10
Message Posted On Mar 23rd, 2013, 10:32 am

It's risky behavior, you know it eventually will blow up in your face. It seems the multiple show runners so far have managed to protect the show and the actors, and have shared in the vision for the show, but they seem to be doing something that the higher ups don't like, so how long until it brings down the show?



Level 1 (70%)
Mood: aggravated
Since: 02/Feb/13
Message Posted On Mar 23rd, 2013, 5:25 am

It might not change that much, but at the same time it's rather hard to see how something like this can be a positive thing for the show. Somehow it's more or less bound to be negative :/

Related news

What Did You Think of The Walking Dead's Shocking Mid-Season Finale?

Last night’s The Walking Dead mid-season finale “Pretty Much Dead..

"The Walking Dead" Graphic Novels Dominate The New York Times Bestseller List

The Walking Dead has become one of television's freshest and most unique..

AMC Developing "Goodfellas" Weekly Drama

AMC is the cable station that was once an underdog, but is now home to..