Login or register  

NRA president discusses gun in schools on 'Meet the Press'

Last week, the CEO of the National Rifle Association, Wayne LaPierre, suggested that schools across the United States could be made safer if congressional action to assign armed police officers to public schools happened as soon as possible. Those comments were met with great criticism across the country and LaPierre's press conference has drawn a lot of criticism from people who watched it.

LaPierre went on NBC's 'Meet the Press' to explain his comments more and defend his thoughts on the mater and why he thinks tragic events like the Newtown, Conn., shootings can be avoided in the future.

“If it’s crazy to call for putting police and armed security in our school to protect our children, then call me crazy,” LaPierre said to 'Meet the Press' host David Gregory. “I think the American people think it’s crazy not to do it. I know [Newtown] wants to argue about gun control. It’s not going to work. It hasn’t worked.”

The topic drifted into the assault weapons ban that California Senator Dianne Feinstein is calling for. LaPierre thinks it is baseless, calling it a  “phony piece of legislation" that is “built on lies.”

“It’s not going to make any kid safer,” he said. “We’ve got to get to the real problems, the real causes, and that’s what the NRA is trying to do. I don’t believe that’s going to make one difference. There are so many different ways to evade that even if you had that. You had that for 10 years when Dianne Feinstein passed that ban in ’94. It was on the books; Columbine occurred right in the middle of it. It didn’t make any difference.”

Gregory asked LaPierre is regulating high-capacity magazine clips would help cut down on shootings, which LaPierre said would not "make one difference." 

"But this is a matter of logic, Mr. LaPierre," Gregory said. "Because anybody watching this is going to say,  'Hey, wait a minute. I just heard Mr. LaPierre say that we should try anything that might reduce the violence. And you're telling me that it's not a matter of common sense that if you don't have an ability to shoot off 30 rounds without reloading, that, just possibly, you could reduce the loss of life?"

"I don't buy your argument for a minute," LaPierre said. "There are so many different ways he could've done it."

What do you think about this?

- Meet the Press (US)

Written by: Hamatosan
Dec 24th, 2012, 12:25 am

(Crazed Contributor)

Level 44 (34%)
Points: 14943.1
Mood: Like I have a brand new god
Since: 20/Oct/06
Message Posted On Dec 24th, 2012, 1:51 am

That last comment is asinine. Doesn't it stand to reason that if you make it where a shooter has to stop to reload, it might give potential victims to time to run, secure themselves, hide, maybe even take out the shooter? There are times when this pool of debate stirs (and I try not to wade in it), that it seems like the gun holders shift arguments simply to cover for not wanting to make any kind of sacrifice on their part, and that seems to be one. I can understand the freedom granted in having guns, but why is there this huge collective hard-on for them so much? I don't believe there's a coincidence that less gun cultured countries have fewer gun-related deaths.

Related news

Fan Made Community Mashup with Parks & Rec

Fans of NBC's Thursday night line-up are in for a real treat.  A video is..

Parks And Recreation Sees Return of Louis C.K

NBC's "Parks and Recreation" is a darling of the Thursday primetime comedy..

The Office Gets Own High-Quality Paper Brand

Is this a case of commercial tie-ins gone too far? The fictional paper..